This book brings together analyses in the fields of value theory, normative and applied ethics on the issue of killing animals it addresses a number of questions: can painless killing harm or benefit an animal and, if so, why and under what conditions “can coming into existence harm or benefit an animal is killing animals morally acceptable. While it is generally accepted that animal welfare matters morally, it is less clear how to morally evaluate the ending of an animal's life it seems to matter for the animal whether it experiences pain or pleasure, or enjoyment or suffering.
The ethics of killing animals published: february 25, 2016 tatjana višak and robert garner (eds), the ethics of killing animals , oxford university press, 2015, 252pp, $2995 (pbk), isbn 9780199396085. The question of animal suffering is addressed, as is the morality of killing animals throughout the book, these theoretical considerations are related to current practices in which animals are created and killed. The ethics of killing animals for food essay sample picture a summertime barbecue children playing in the grass, friends and family gathered to share a meal, hot dogs and hamburgers cooking over the grill. Temporarily out of stock order now and we'll deliver when available 5 out of 5 stars 1 the ethical carnivore: my year killing to eat jan 2, 2018.
The animals who kill other animals for food do so because they have no choice in the matter - it is a matter of necessity and survival and they would starve to death otherwise choosing vegetarianism. In this video, tyler asks why it is morally permissible to kill animals for food he offers a few explanations that seem unsatisfactory so, he asks you for help answering this question about animals ethics speaker: tyler doggett. The ethics of killing animals addresses these value-theoretical questions about animal life, death and welfare it also discusses whether and how answers to these questions are relevant for our moral duties towards animals. Ethical vegetarians say that the reasons for not hurting or killing animals are similar to the reasons for not hurting or killing humans they argue that killing an animal, like killing a human, can only be justified in extreme circumstances consuming a living creature just for its taste, for convenience, or out of habit is not justifiable.
14 results for the ethics of killing animals the ethics of killing animals oct 1, 2015 by tatjana visak and robert garner paperback $3195 $ 31 95 prime free shipping on eligible orders in stock more buying choices $1776 (36 used & new offers) kindle edition $3035 $ 30 35 get it today, jul 29. I personally consider ethical concerns about animal welfare as one of our most important considerations in killing animals however, when engaging in discussions with one another over the ethics of using animals, we need to be conscious of the foundational assumptions on which these conversations are built.
I think it's much more ethical for a person to hunt and kill a wild animal, who until the moment of death, had lived a naturally free life compared to the deplorable suffering we breed billions of animals into every year, it makes wild hunting look downright humane. Most cognitive ethologists and philosophers agree that animals have no concept of the future and cannot imagine themselves existing into the future this lack of psychological sophistication, most ethicists contend, means that painlessly killing animals does them no harm and therefore painless killing does not raise much of an ethical quandary. In this excellent new volume, tatjana višak and robert garner bring together twelve essays on the ethics of killing animals, their introduction, and an afterword by peter singer.
This is an important question if simply inflicting a painless death on an animal is wrong, then killing in any form of animal agriculture will most likely be wrong as well community concern for animal suffering or cruelty is based upon a concern for the animals themselves. In discussing the ethics around the use of animals, we must be thoughtful to the fact that understandings of central concepts such as death and killing are not universal cultures throughout the world have vastly different understandings of what it means to die, what happens after death, the relationship between life and death, and therefore what it means on a deep ethical level to kill an animal.